# HASONEVALUE vs ISFILTERED in DAX

I use the function HASONEVALUE quite often, many times it is in the context of solving problems with the total row. I wrote a blog on how to handle totals using HASONEVALUE here:

Unfortunately, HASONEVALUE is not always the tool for the job. For this scenario I am returning Homes Sold Month-to-Date. The final solution should look like the following screenshot:

As you can see in the previous image we want to return the Homes Sold MTD if we are at the day level or the month level, but if we are at a level higher than the month level then we simply want to return a blank value. It doesn’t make sense in this scenario to show MTD homes sold at the quarter or year level. If we use HASONEVALUE(‘date’[Date]) here, then no value is returned at the Month level. Here is an example:

As you can see in this example, a blank value is returned for the month of January. As previously mentioned the desired behavior is to return a value for the month of January.

## IsFiltered

IsFiltered: Returns TRUE when columnName is being filtered directly. Else, False.

Let’s take a look at what IsFiltered returns if we are checking to see if the date is filtered:

ISFILTERED returns False for the month and Year as expected. Now, we can simply chain multiple IsFiltered functions together to return our desired results. In the following screenshot I added an or condition to check if the month was also filtered. As you can see, the results now return TRUE at the day and month level.

Now we can apply some conditional logic using the IF function based on the results of the IsFiltered expression in example above. If the day or month IsFiltered then return the MTD homes sold, else return BLANK(). See below:

Thanks for checking out my blog!

# Unexpected Totals in DAX (Part 3)

At some point or another every DAX author realizes that the total row is not the sum of each row/cell in a given column. This can be quite confusing and is exactly why I am writing a third blog post dedicated to the total row.  If you missed part one or part two in this series you can find them below:

## Problem

In this blog, we want to return YTD Sales for previous months and Forecast YTD Sales for the current month. Therefore, there should be only one measure and that measure should return YTD Sales or Forecast YTD based on the month.

In the following table there are three measures, the first measure is YTD Sales and it tracks the actual sales. The second measure is Forecast YTD Sales and this is the forecasted sales. The third measure is the Dynamic Measure, this is the proposed measure designed to replace the other two measures. However, the total row produces unexpected results, and therefore is perfect for this blog post:

In the above screenshot, the total row for the dynamic measure is displaying \$19,582,120 but the sum of all the rows is actually \$28,164,680. Let’s take a look at the dynamic measure and figure out why the total row is not what we might expect.

## Dynamic Measure

The “Dynamic Measure” is returning the YTD Sales for completed months and returning the Forecast YTD Sales for the current month. Let’s take a quick look at the measure just to understand better what is going on. Please note, for this example we assume there are sales for every day of the year.

• A = Two variables to make the code more readable (See descriptions below):
• LastSaleDate = Return the last day the company had a sale (in the current filter context)
• LastDayOfMonth = Return the last day from the date table (in the current filter context)
• B = The logical test performed by the IF function.
• If the two variables don’t match, then it is the current month and [Forecast YTD Sales] is returned.
• If the two variables do match, then it is a completed month and [YTD Sales] is returned.

## Filter Context of the Total Row

The total row is executing the dynamic measure within the context at the total row. What is the last day in the date table within the current filter context? At the total row it is 12/31/2008, there is a filter on the report page that filters the report down to only the year 2008. The last day that there was a valid sale was on 6/20/2008. Since 12/31/2008 does not equal 6/20/2008 the calculation returns Forecasted YTD Sales, which at the total level is \$19,582,120.60.

Steps to solve this problem:

1. Determine if the calculation is at the total row.
2. For the total row perform the Dynamic Measure calculation for each month in the table separately.
3. Sum the results of each result separately.

However, steps two and three above are a little bit more complex than they sound and therefore to complete the solution we need to introduce you to two new functions in the DAX language: VALUES and SUMX. The great news is this is a design pattern that you will be able to use in many different scenarios!

## The VALUES function in DAX

MSDN Definition:
Returns a one-column table that contains the distinct values from the specified table or column.

Remember step 2 from above? We want to execute our dynamic measure against each row in the table, the VALUES function will get us the distinct list of the months. Let’s take a look at the VALUES function in action. I have created a table using the following formula to display the results:

The VALUES function returned a distinct list of months. This is exactly what we need. Now, how do we execute our measure against each row in this table and then SUM all the results at the very end to get the expected value at the total row? SUMX!!

## Working with the SUMX Function in DAX

MSDN Definition: Returns the sum of an expression evaluated for each row in a table.

Syntax:

Perfect! The SUMX function is going to iterate over the list of months and execute the dynamic measure against each month. After this process has completed the SUMX function will then SUM the results returned for each month.

SUMX accepts two parameters, the first parameter is a table and the second parameter is the expression. The table that is returned from the VALUES function is the first parameter and the dynamic measure is passed in as the second parameter (expression). Let’s take a look at the final solution.

## Solution

The following solution now returns the expected results for the total row:

Here are the results, pay special attention to the total row:

# Unexpected Totals in DAX (Part 2)

In a previous blog post we discussed how to replace the total row with a blank value, primarily to eliminate confusion. You can find the original post here: Unexpected Totals in DAX (Part 1)

In this post we want to go a step further and replace the total row with our own DAX calculation.

Our goal is to replace the value of 8,691 with the value of 1,005. The value of 1,005 is the total number of new homes listed on the market in 2016, which in our case is the last year or current year of the data set we are looking at. This is slightly more challenging though, because our date table goes to the year 2018. But just wait, we will get to that shortly.

Let’s take a look at the steps to solve this problem:

1. Identify if the calculation is at the total row, we will use HASONEVALUE as we did in the previous blog post.
2. Determine the MAX year in the data set with homes on market, not the last year in your date table, but the last year with actual homes listed on the market.
3. Write a calculation that returns the New Homes on Market for the last year in the data set.

I am going to create a new measure so we can look at the two measures side by side.

I have modified the original DAX calculation, here we first check to see if we are at the total row using HASONEVALUE, if we are at the total row then we return blank. If this doesn’t make sense, please stop and go back to Part 1 where I cover this in detail.

• A = Check to see if the current filter context has one value, if not, then we are at total row.
• B = If there is more than one year in the filter context, replace with a blank value.

## Determine the last year with homes listed.

Now that the total row has been identified, it’s time to author a DAX formula that returns the total homes listed for the last year in our data. The last year with homes listed in our data is 2016, therefore we need to write a DAX formula that reads like this:

Return the number of new homes listed in 2016.

Now, technically we can’t write the year 2016 in our formula because we know that this would no longer work once we move into the next year and we need our DAX formula to be dynamic (automated) and change with the years. Here is our first attempt at getting the MAX year.

• A = Return the MAX year in the Filter Context
• B = Return the MAX year from the variable at the total row.

For demo and validation purposes I am displaying the results of the variable in the total row (The max year), here we can see that the results are maybe not what we would have expected. The year 2018 is the last year in our date table but not the last year that new homes were listed. One way to get the last year with homes listed is to use the function LASTNONBLANK.

## LASTNONBLANK

For the sake of brevity I won’t cover LASTNONBLANK here, but I will do a separate blog series on semi-additive measures. Let’s rewrite the DAX formula:

Using LASTNONBLANK we now get the last year that we had new homes listed. See results below:

Perfect! The hard part is over, now we simply count the total rows where the listing date of the home equals the year 2016.

Here is the final result:

As always, thanks for reading and I hope this helped!

# Unexpected Totals in DAX (Part 1)

DAX is an awesome language and when paired with properly created relationships, DAX can add significant analytical value to your data models with minimum effort. But, you already knew that! So why are we here? Well, sometimes, DAX can produce results that are unexpected and this is usually very noticeable when looking at the totals row.

So why do we get unexpected results at the total row? Why doesn’t the total row simply return the sum of all the rows in a specified column? The simple answer is your DAX calculation is also computed for the total row and operates within the contexts of the total row. Let’s take a look at the previous screenshot.

In this example, the total row is returning all homes listed for all years in the filter context, this is in fact the sum of all the rows in the column. However, you may expect to only see the homes newly listed on the market for the latest time period, in this case that would be how many homes were listed in 2016. The result of 8,691 homes listed in the total row is not wrong or incorrect, it depends on what you are specifically looking for, it could definitely be unexpected depending on your analytical needs. If you do not wish to see the total of all homes ever listed in the current filter context then you have a couple of options available to you.

There are generally 3 ways you could address incorrect / unexpected totals.

1. Pretend the problem doesn’t exist. (ProTip: Don’t ignore problems.)
2. Identify when the DAX calculation is being evaluated for the total row and return a BLANK value.
3. Identify when the DAX calculation is being evaluated for the total row and perform a different calculation.

In this blog post you are going to learn how to return blank to eliminate any confusion. In a future blog post you will learn how to use DAX to change the value of the total row.

## HASONEVALUE function in DAX

In this simple example, the total row is the sum of all the rows, but this is not what we want. What we would want to show at the total row is how many homes have recently been listed for sale, not the total of all homes that have ever been listed. The first thing we must do is identify if we are at a total row. The way I do this is by using the function HASONEVALUE.

MSDN Definition:

HASONEVALUE: Returns TRUE when the context for the columnName has been filtered down to one distinct value only. Otherwise FALSE.

In the screenshot below I created a new measure called “Totals” and in this measure the function HASONEVALUE is used to correctly identify which row is the total row. This works because at the total level the filter context is all years, so the function returns FALSE.

The final step is to now use conditional logic and replace the Total row with a blank value.

## BLANK() function in DAX

New Homes on Market (2)=
IF(
HASONEVALUE(‘Date'[Year]),
[New Homes on Market],
BLANK())

Now the total row is no longer confusing or misleading. In part two of this series I am going to take this a step further and show how to use DAX to return your expected results at the total row instead of just returning blank!

Further Reading: Rob Collie over at PowerPivotPro has a great blog post on HASONEVALUE vs. ISFILTERED vs. HASONEFILTER:
https://powerpivotpro.com/2013/03/hasonevalue-vs-isfiltered-vs-hasonefilter/

Thanks!